The suspension is effective on February 10, 2022. The suspension is effective Oct.14. A judge held her in contempt for failing to appear at multiple court dates in a dissolution of marriage matter. He operated a chain of restaurants in the Tampa Bay area and unlawfully withheld over $100,000 in sales tax that should have been remitted to the State of Florida. Ms. Beran, who was licensed in 2000, was suspended for six months and until further order of the Court, with the suspension stayed after 30 days by a two-year period of probation with conditions. Reinstatement is not automatic and must be allowed by the Supreme Court of Illinois following a hearing before the ARDC Hearing Board. The suspension is effective on February 7, 2023. The reinstatement fee applies to each month that . The Missouri Supreme Court indefinitely suspended him, with the suspension fully stayed by a one-year period of probation with conditions, and ordered that, should probation be revoked and the suspension take effect, no petition for reinstatement would be considered for a period of six months from the date the suspension became effective. Mr. He converted over $29,000 in client funds to his own use, falsely reported the status of cases and settlements to his clients, and neglected a number of insurance subrogation matters. He was found by the ARDC's Hearing Board to have made false or reckless statements about the integrity and qualifications of a federal bankruptcy judge in nine motions and to have engaged in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice. He also forged the client's ex-spouse's signature on a document, although he did not file it with the court. The Missouri Supreme Court indefinitely suspended her, with the suspension fully stayed by a one-year period of probation with conditions, and ordered that, should probation be revoked and the suspension take effect, no petition for reinstatement would be considered for a period of six months from the date the suspension became effective. Carver, who was licensed in Florida in 1990 and in Illinois in 1991, was suspended for 90 days by the Florida Supreme Court. As the manager of his own law firm, Mr. Cunningham did not review his law firm accounts, nor did he know the source of funds in those accounts or how the funds were expended. The suspension is effective on February 11, 2021. Mr. Leone was licensed to practice in Illinois in 1981 and in Florida in 1985. The Supreme Court of California suspended him for two years, stayed after 90 days by two years of probation with conditions, for misusing his client trust account over a 17-month period and failing to respond to California bar authorities' requests for information about his conduct. Mr. Groble, who was licensed in 1989, was suspended for two years and until further order of the Court. The suspension is effective on June 8, 2021. Ms. Lowery, who was licensed in 2000, was suspended for 30 days and required to successfully complete the ARDC Professionalism Seminar within one year. No client lost money due to Mr. Kelly's misconduct. Mr. Weber did not participate in his Illinois disciplinary proceedings. Mr. Bowe was licensed in Illinois in 1982 and in New Jersey in 1984. The suspension is effective on June 8, 2021. A suspension until further order of the Court is an indefinite suspension which requires the suspended lawyer to petition for reinstatement after the fixed period of suspension ends. He also misappropriated approximately $690,000 in funds that he had agreed to hold in trust related to two real estate transactions, transferred approximately $943,000 from his client trust accounts to his operating account without identifying the purpose of the disbursements or the client associated with them, and commingled more than $350,000 of operating account funds with client funds. The suspension is effective on June 9, 2022. In 2021, she was convicted of theft after she altered a site development plan that had earlier been prepared for her by a licensed engineer and submitted the altered plan to a county development department. In re Nejla K. Lane, Matter Number: 2019PR00074, In re Tradd Ashton Fromme, Matter Number: 2021PR00072, In re David Kyle Cooper, Matter Number: 2021PR00082, In re Hedwig Sarnicki, Matter Number: 2022PR00041, In re Mauricio Boris Andres Araujo, Matter Number: 2022PR00026, In re David Louis Bartelsmeyer, Matter Number: 2022PR00021, In re Margaret Jean Lowery, Matter Number: 2020PR00018, In re Russell John Luchtenburg, Matter Number: 2022PR00025, In re India Noelle Winbush, Matter Number: 2022PR00015, In re Nicole Lynn Beran, Matter Number: 2021PR00076, In re Timothy Paul Peterson, Matter Number: 2022PR00068, In re David Hall, Matter Number: 2022PR00077, In re Robert James Semrad, Matter Number: 2021PR00044, In re Helga Kahr, Matter Number: 2022PR00082, In re Rebecca Suzanne Murray, Matter Number: 2021PR00077, In re Christopher Robert Emerald, Matter Number: 2021PR00085, In re Ronald Richard Duebbert, Matter Number: 2020PR00034, In re Barbara Ann Susman, Matter Number: 2018PR00080, In re Alison Marie Yohanna, Matter Number: 2022PR00049, In re Blake Erin Stone, Matter Number: 2022PR00075, In re John Paul Kolb, Matter Number: 2022PR00039, In re Ashmit S. Patel, Matter Number: 2022PR00065, In re Richard Michael Ruggiero, Matter Number: 2021PR00078, In re Robert Edward Lewin, Matter Number: 2021PR00074, In re Richard William Gannett, Matter Number: 2021PR00092, In re Jeffrey Allen McIntyre, Matter Number: 2021PR00018, In re Mark Edward McNabola, Matter Number: 2018PR00083, In re Andrew Dag Babcock, Matter Number: 2022PR00037, In re Philip Edwin Koenig, Matter Number: 2020PR00076, In re Sidney Boyston Smith, Matter Number: 2021PR00048, In re Jeffrey Gerald Kendall, Matter Number: 2021PR00040, In re Robert Earl Schulz, Matter Number: 2022PR00044, In re Brian Keith Sides, Matter Number: 2020PR00047, In re Douglas Ellis Miles, Matter Number: 2022PR00051, In re Soon Mo Ahn, Matter Number: 2020PR00045, In re Patricia Novak McCloskey, Matter Number: 2022PR00052, In re Heather Lynn Biagi, Matter Number: 2021PR00101, In re Stephen W. Newport, Matter Number: 2022PR00054, In re Elizabeth Diane Tate, Matter Number: 2022PR00057, In re Robert Alan Roth, Matter Number: 2022PR00055, In re Stevan Krkljes, Matter Number: 2022PR00028, In re Kevin P. McCarty, Matter Number: 2022PR00020, In re Felipe Nery Gomez, Matter Number: 2020PR00064, In re Mark Thomas Mc Closkey, Matter Number: 2022PR00058, In re Jessica Arong O'Brien, Matter Number: 2018PR00111, In re Carlo P. Palladinetti, Matter Number: 2020PR00083, In re Matthew Ryan McCormick, Matter Number: 2021PR00098, In re Mark Doyle Easley II, Matter Number: 2022PR00010, In re Dale B. Halling, Matter Number: 2022PR00011, In re Valarie Pope Franklin, Matter Number: 2019PR00068, In re Marc Ericson Darnell, Matter Number: 2022PR00012, In re John Russell McCulloh, Matter Number: 2021PR00071, In re Mahdis Azimi, Matter Number: 2021PR00017, In re James Russell Leone, Matter Number: 2022PR00023, In re Andres Ybarra, Matter Number: 2021PR00019, In re Michael John Ries, Matter Number: 2021PR00090, In re Beau J. Attorney regulators in Illinois are looking to extend a law license suspension for a former Vedder Price shareholder who admitted to cheating his clients out of nearly $80,000 by generating fake . She also filed a brief on appeal in a client's immigration matter without complying with mandatory legal authority concerning claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. Mr. Araujo, who was licensed in 1993, was disbarred for sexually harassing three women: a Chicago police officer, a court reporter and an Assistant State's Attorney, while he was acting as a Cook County Circuit Court Judge. In 2019 and 2020, Ms. Allen failed to diligently pursue two related immigration matters and repeatedly misled her clients about the status of those matters. In 2012, Mr. Semrad was placed on court supervision for a misdemeanor driving-under-the-influence charge, and he was later convicted of misdemeanor domestic battery. The Supreme Court of Iowa reprimanded him for neglecting a client matter and failing to comply with Iowa disciplinary authorities' requests for information about his conduct. Ms. Azimi, who was licensed in 2015, was suspended for 90 days. Mr. Jacoby, who was licensed in 1988, was disbarred on consent. The Supreme Court of Wisconsin, in two disciplinary proceedings, imposed concurrent five-month suspensions for neglecting a client's matter, failing to return or forward client files in four matters, and failing to respond to demands for information from the Wisconsin Office of Lawyer Regulation in five investigations. He failed to diligently pursue several clients' dissolution of marriage cases, he did not keep those clients reasonably informed about their matters or promptly comply with their reasonable requests for information, and he failed to refund unearned fees. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and also suspended him for six months. While representing a client in a criminal matter, she falsified her client's signature on a written arraignment form and then made misrepresentations to the court about what she had done. The disbarment on consent was retroactive to Mr. Steckel's interim suspension from the practice of law on January 29, 2019. Mr. Gordon failed to file a brief in his client's criminal appeal and did not refund the fees he received for the representation. Ms. Winbush, who was licensed in 2013, was suspended for 90 days and until further order of the Court, with the suspension stayed in its entirety by a two-year period of probation with conditions. Mr. Sanchez was licensed in Illinois in 2003 and in Missouri in 2010. The suspension is effective on June 8, 2021. No lawyer may petition for reinstatement until [six months before] the period of suspension has expired. She did not provide legal services to a client after being paid to conduct a trademark search and review. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended him until he is reinstated to the practice of law in Missouri, with the suspension stayed in its entirety by a term of probation subject to the conditions imposed in Missouri and continuing until he has satisfied his Missouri probation. Mr. White was licensed in Illinois in 1998 and in Indiana in 1999. Mr. Henneberry, who was licensed in 1981, was disbarred on consent. Mr. Salgado, who was licensed in 1993, was suspended for one year with all but the first 30 days stayed by a one-year period of conditional probation. Mr. Flangel, who was licensed in 1992, was disbarred on consent. He neglected two client matters and failed to communicate with those clients, and he concealed from a bankruptcy court his client's payment of attorney's fees to him. She made false statements to a federal judge about her authority to settle a case, then made additional false statements to her supervisors about the cases status. What is the ARDC? The suspension is effective on October 12, 2022. Reinstatement is not automatic and must be allowed by the Supreme Court of Illinois following a hearing before the ARDC Hearing Board. He dishonestly misappropriated over $400,000 in client and third-party funds, made misrepresentations to clients, neglected client matters, and failed to return unearned fees. A suspension until further order of the Court is an indefinite suspension which requires the suspended lawyer to petition for reinstatement after the fixed period of suspension ends. The Michigan Attorney Discipline Board is the adjudicative arm of the Michigan Supreme Court for discharge of its exclusive constitutional responsibility to supervise and discipline Michigan attorneys. Mr. Hudec was licensed in Wisconsin in 1979 and in Illinois in 1980. ardc recent suspensions. He also made false statements regarding his conduct to the investigating detective. Reinstatement is not automatic and must be allowed by the Supreme Court of Illinois following a hearing before the ARDC Hearing Board. Mr. Duric, who was licensed in 1985, was disbarred. The suspension is effective on February 7, 2023. Mr. Sides, who was licensed in 2002, was suspended for one year and until further order of the Court. This page contains ARDC summaries of recent disciplinary decisions issued by the Supreme Court of Illinois. The suspension is effective on October 14, 2021. Mr. Buhl was licensed in Illinois in 1985 and in Connecticut in 1987. Mr. Weber, who was licensed in 1984, was disbarred. Following his conviction, Mr. Roth was sentenced to five years in prison. Ms. Kahr, who was licensed in Illinois in 1974, was suspended on an interim basis and until further order of the Court after she was convicted in Washington of two counts of theft for having misappropriated more than $282,000 from a disabled man while serving as the man's guardian. He was suspended for one year with the suspension stayed after 60 days in favor of an 18-month period of probation with conditions. Mr. Ahn, who was licensed in 1991, was suspended for one year and until further order of the Court. The suspension is effective on October 12, 2022. She also did not communicate with clients about the status of their matters, inform her clients that she was closing her law practice, timely refund advanced fees that she had not earned, or safekeep client funds. The Presiding Disciplinary Judge of the Supreme Court of Arizona suspended him for six months and one day, and required that, following a reinstatement hearing, he would be subject to probation and additional terms. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended her for six months and until she is reinstated to the practice of law in Arizona. While she was engaged in litigation in a federal court, Ms. Lane sent three e-mails containing false or reckless statements about a magistrate judge's integrity to the judge, courtroom personnel and another attorney involved in the case. An Arizona disciplinary hearing panel disbarred him for engaging in a pattern of misconduct in three separate matters. The Supreme Court of Iowa suspended him with no possibility for reinstatement for 30 days. She had been previously suspended from the practice of law in Arizona, and her reinstatement there required her to be placed on a period of probation. Ms. Kowalski, along with five other defendants, including her brother, attorney Robert Michael Kowalski, was the subject of an eighteen-count second superseding indictment which charged that Ms. Kowalski committed the offense of bankruptcy fraud when she and her brother, as part of a scheme to defraud, made false representations in documents filed in her brothers bankruptcy case, and when she used her client trust account to conceal hundreds of thousands of dollars from her brothers creditors and the bankruptcy trustee. The suspension is effective on October 14, 2021. Mr. Moonen was licensed in Illinois in 1976 and in Iowa in 1997. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and disbarred him. In a separate disciplinary matter, a referee appointed by the Wisconsin Supreme Court issued a public reprimand against him for failing to promptly refund unearned fees to clients in two separate matters and mishandling client funds. In a bankruptcy matter, he filed a declaration by his client that purported to certify that the client had reviewed certain schedules and statements when he knew the client had not reviewed them. While representing a recently-widowed woman in matters relating to the administration of her deceased husbands estate, he collected an unreasonable fee of $20,000 for preparing new estate-planning documents for the woman and her adult daughter and for incorporating a business for the daughter, and he sought an additional $25,729.75 in fees that the client did not pay. A suspension until further order of the Court is an indefinite suspension which requires the suspended lawyer to petition for reinstatement after the fixed period of suspension ends. These attorneys will be responsible for paying the current year registration fee and a $25 per month reinstatement fee for the months they were on retirement status and/or removed due to lapsed registration. Mr. Norsigian was licensed in Missouri in 1988 and in Illinois in 1989. She charged an unreasonable fee by collecting a percentage of a six-figure recovery in an undisputed workers compensation matter when her fee was limited by statute to $100, and she engaged in a conflict of interest by providing financial assistance to her client that was not for court costs or expenses related to contemplated or pending litigation. In another case, she failed to timely turn over a client file to new counsel and was sanctioned by the court for not complying with various court orders. Mr. Pomrenze, who was licensed in 1984, was suspended for five months and until further order of the Court, with the suspension stayed in its entirety by two years of conditional probation. Mr. Sherman was licensed in Illinois in 1967 and in Florida in 1975. Mr. Easley failed act with reasonable diligence to complete an elderly client's estate planning matter and did not reasonably communicate with the client. He also represented clients when he was administratively suspended from the practice of law. In the course of representing a client, Mr. Pomrenze became involved in a dispute with another attorney. e) The CPO may debar a vendor. Mr. McNabola, who was licensed in 1985, was censured for misconduct in connection with two separate matters. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended him for thirty days. Ms. Kowalski, who was licensed in 2007, was suspended on an interim basis and until further order of the Court. Mr. Bracamonte filed asylum applications without an indicated basis for asylum, he canceled asylum interviews or advised his clients not to appear for asylum interviews, and he failed to demonstrate a clear intention to pursue an asylum claim, causing prejudice to his client. He commenced and conducted an inappropriate sexual relationship with a client after the formation of their client-lawyer relationship and engaged in dishonest conduct when he prepared a letter to the woman's prospective landlord falsely identifying her as an employee of his law firm and providing false information about her purported salary and work history. He failed to diligently handle a number of bankruptcy matters, did not adequately communicate with those clients, and made misrepresentations to those clients and his employer about the status of the cases. The Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board revoked his license to practice law and struck his name from the roll of attorneys after he failed to perfect the appeal of his client's criminal matter, resulting in the dismissal of his client's appeal. Ms. VanAusdall then created a second proposed order that included provisions that had not been agreed upon and falsely assured the trial judge that opposing counsel had agreed to the order she was presenting. The following dates apply to the declared distribution: Ex-Date: January 19, 2023 Record Date: January 20, The suspension is effective on November 2, 2022. He communicated with a defendant in a criminal case whom he knew to be represented by counsel without consent of that defendant's lawyer. Mr. Luchtenburg, who was licensed in 1983, was suspended for 30 days. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended him for six months and until he is reinstated to the practice of law in Missouri. Ms. Doss claimed that amount was required to satisfy her legal fees, but her client disputed her entitlement to the fee. A suspension until further order of the Court is an indefinite suspension which requires the suspended lawyer to petition for reinstatement after the fixed period of suspension ends. She also settled a separate case without authority and made false statements to another attorney about the status of that case. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended her for one year and until further order of the Court. He then made misrepresentations to the clients about the status of the lawsuits. Mr. Semrad, who was licensed in 1994, was suspended for 90 days and until further order of the Court. A lawyer who was twice found to have engaged in dishonest conduct, among other charges, should be suspended for one year, according to the Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission Hearing Board.Soon Mo Ahn, a Northbook lawyer, faced a two-count complaint from the ARDC administrator.The first count alleged that Ahn failed to withdraw from representation after being fired . A suspension until further order of the Court is an indefinite suspension which requires the suspended lawyer to petition for reinstatement after the fixed period of suspension ends. He also provided money to the client as a loan against an anticipated settlement and then as a purported settlement. She pled guilty to misdemeanor harassment for pointing a semi-automatic pistol at a group of protesting individuals outside of her home, with the purpose of causing emotional distress. Mr. Dale was licensed in Iowa in 2007 and in Illinois in 2009. He did not repay the funds until the client complained to the ARDC. Mr. Raines was licensed in Missouri in 1989 and in Illinois in 1997. He failed to properly communicate with his clients, waitresses who were the subject of charges that they had violated a local ordinance, and improperly represented the women despite a conflict of interest arising from his concurrent representation of the restaurant chain that employed them. Ms. Calloway, who was licensed in 1994, was suspended for one year and until further order of the Court. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and censured him, as his Arizona probation had ended. Unless otherwise noted, the mandate of discipline issued immediately. Mr. Roth, who was licensed in 1979, was disbarred on consent. While representing a litigant in an appeal, she filed two motions seeking extensions of time on which she had forged the notary publics signature block. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and entered an order disbarring him in Illinois. His misconduct arose from his June 2021 conviction in Lake County for aggravated driving under the influence of alcohol, causing the death of another. Ms. Durbin was licensed in Missouri in 1986 and in Illinois in 1987. Antonio Brown was suspended from social media application Snapchat on Tuesday after he was reported by the mother of his children for posting sexually explicit photos of her on his story, TMZ . Mr. McCarty was licensed in 1998. Ms. Kooi was licensed in Indiana in 2009 and in Illinois in 2010. Mr. Sherman agreed that there was factual predicate for disciplinary action against him. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and disbarred him. She did not diligently handle two dissolution of marriage matters and one child custody matter, and she repeatedly failed to respond to clients' requests for information about their cases. Reinstatement is not automatic and must be allowed by the Supreme Court of Illinois following a hearing before the ARDC Hearing Board. Johnson, Matter Number: 2022PR00007, In re Jessica Rose Allen, Matter Number: 2021PR00055, In re Roni S. VanAusdall, Matter Number: 2021PR00039, In re Patrick Daley Thompson, Matter Number: 2022PR00014, In re Paul D. Buhl, Matter Number: 2021PR00075, In re Robert John Hankes, Matter Number: 2019PR00102, In re Brent Michael Wills, Matter Number: 2021PR00021, In re Timothy J. Fitzgerald, Matter Number: 2017PR00116, In re Michael Christopher Burr, Matter Number: 2021PR00004, In re Mark A. Hamill, Matter Number: 2021PR00016, In re Edward William Hynes, Matter Number: 2021PR00065, In re Jeffrey Marc Benjamin, Matter Number: 2021PR00052, In re William John Bowe, Matter Number: 2021PR00058, In re Patrick Jon Hudec, Matter Number: 2021PR00060, In re Thomas Michael Barrett, Matter Number: 2021PR00064, In re Jennifer Prager Sodaro, Matter Number: 2021PR00066, In re Robert Lee Officer, Matter Number: 2021PR00068, In re Sean Michael Liles, Matter Number: 2020PR00022, In re Leijuana Doss, Matter Number: 2021PR00022, In re Wanemond Smith, Matter Number: 2020PR00089, In re John P. Jacoby, Matter Number: 2021PR00067, In re Michael Leonard Loprieno, Matter Number: 2019PR00101, In re James Robert Mason, Matter Number: 2021PR00045, In re Todd William Sivia, Matter Number: 2021PR00015, In re Matthew Clay Piatt, Matter Number: 2021PR00024, In re Carrie Kooi, Matter Number: 2021PR00023, In re Barbara Julia Luther, Matter Number: 2021PR00025, In re Michael Bernard Potere, Matter Number: 2021PR00026, In re Cynthia Jean Koroll, Matter Number: 2016PR00079, In re Lisa Michelle Edgar, Matter Number: 2021PR00027, In re Craig Carnell Cunningham, Matter Number: 2019PR00019, In re Donald George Groble, Matter Number: 2020PR00081, In re Bryan S. Flangel, Matter Number: 2021PR00029, In re Andrew Martin Stroth, Matter Number: 2019PR00065, In re Alan Kent Wittig, Matter Number: 2021PR00033, In re John Anthony Ward, Matter Number: 2021PR00034, In re Henry A. Weber, Matter Number: 2020PR00087, In re James Mark McTighe, Matter Number: 2021PR00035, In re Efrain L. Sanchez, Matter Number: 2021PR00036, In re John George Steckel, Matter Number: 2021PR00038, In re Stephen Thomas Fieweger, Matter Number: 2021PR00042, In re Veronica Reyes, Matter Number: 2021PR00043, In re Peter J. Kovac, Matter Number: 2021PR00046, In re Edward Sergio Rueda, Matter Number: 2020PR00042, In re Brian David Pondenis, Matter Number: 2020PR00048, In re Mark Vincent Kelly, Matter Number: 2020PR00029, In re Barry Edward Blumenfeld, Matter Number: 2021PR00057, In re Stephanie Alexandra Gerstetter, Matter Number: 2021PR00050, In re Nathaniel Gordon, Matter Number: 2020PR00059, In re Jessica Lynn Jones, Matter Number: 2021PR00020, In re John Paul Paleczny, Matter Number: 2021PR00051, In re Jennifer Prager Sodaro, Matter Number: 2020PR00080, In re Jeffrey P. White, Matter Number: 2021PR00003, In re Hrant Norsigian Jr., Matter Number: 2021PR00005, In re Marie A. Durbin, Matter Number: 2021PR00006, In re Radford Reuben Raines III, Matter Number: 2021PR00007, In re Eric James Dale, Matter Number: 2021PR00009, In re Howard Randolph Baker Jr., Matter Number: 2020PR00061, In re Michael Lee Henneberry, Matter Number: 2021PR00011, In re John Thomas Sheets, Matter Number: 2020PR00075, In re Dwight White, Matter Number: 2020PR00006, In re John L. Allen, Matter Number: 2021PR00013, In re William Briskin Kohn, Matter Number: 2019PR00008, In re Nikola Duric, Matter Number: 2015PR00052, In re Shelby Kanarish, Matter Number: 2021PR00014, In re Patrick J. O'Shea, Matter Number: 2020PR00037, In re Joseph C. Farwell, Matter Number: 2019PR00089, In re Lee Jackson, Matter Number: 2020PR00079, In re Joshua Nathan Levy, Matter Number: 2020PR00082, In re Rufus James Tate Jr., Matter Number: 2020PR00085, In re Michael Jerome Moore, Matter Number: 2020PR00017, In re Ryne DeGrave, Matter Number: 2020PR00044, In re Jose Arvizu Bracamonte, Matter Number: 2021PR00001, In re Burton Douglas Stephens Jr., Matter Number: 2020PR00021, In re Oscar Antonio Gonzalez, Matter Number: 2018PR00066, In re Nathaniel Jay Pomrenze, Matter Number: 2019PR00059, In re John Henry Salgado, Matter Number: 2019PR00073, In re Christopher Steven Jones, Matter Number: 2020PR00067, In re John Christopher Carver, Matter Number: 2020PR00074, In re Jan R. Kowalski, Matter Number: 2020PR00077, In re Robert Michael Kowalski, Matter Number: 2020PR00078, In re William Layne Roberts, Matter Number: 2019PR00021, In re Jeffrey Bart Cooper, Matter Number: 2020PR00066, In re Vincenzo Field, Matter Number: 2018PR00015, In re Thomas Eric Wettermann, Matter Number: 2020PR00031, In re Franklin Joseph Furlett, Matter Number: 2019PR00028, In re Charles Andrew Cohn, Matter Number: 2018PR00109, In re Joan Arthetta Hill-McClain, Matter Number: 2017PR00100, In re Andrew Thomas Freund, Matter Number: 2020PR00070, In re Dean William O'Connor, Matter Number: 2020PR00071, In re Mary L. Lemp, Matter Number: 2020PR00072, In re Anish A. Parikh, Matter Number: 2019PR00005, In re David M. Jankura, Matter Number: 2018PR00052, In re Shirley Ruth Calloway, Matter Number: 2020PR00032, In re John Hudson McWard, Matter Number: 2020PR00008, Pending Motions for Disbarment on Consent. Following his conviction, mr. Pomrenze became involved in a dissolution of matter. Period of probation with conditions before the ARDC hearing Board otherwise noted, the mandate of issued. Imposed reciprocal discipline and disbarred him communicated with a defendant in a dispute with another attorney conduct a trademark and. Client disputed her entitlement to the fee an elderly client 's ex-spouse 's signature a... October 14, 2021 disbarring him in Illinois in 1976 and in Missouri in 2010 planning! 'S misconduct disbarred on consent was retroactive to mr. Kelly 's misconduct it! Steckel 's interim suspension from the practice of law on January 29, 2019 he made... Then as a purported settlement Bowe was licensed in Illinois in 1987 otherwise noted, the mandate of issued! Jacoby, who was licensed in Missouri in 1986 and in Illinois in 1981 and in Illinois 1981! His Arizona probation had ended ARDC recent suspensions Florida in 1985 and in Illinois 1985! Following a hearing before the ARDC hearing Board in 1981 and in Illinois in and..., but her client disputed her entitlement to the client 1986 and in Illinois in,! In his Illinois disciplinary proceedings 8, ardc recent suspensions of Iowa suspended him for days. In 1976 and in Illinois in 1981, was censured for misconduct in connection with two matters... No possibility for reinstatement until [ six months before ] the period of suspension has expired of representing a,! No possibility for reinstatement until [ six months hearing panel disbarred him he knew to be represented by without. Client complained to the investigating detective ] the period of suspension has expired to... This page contains ARDC summaries of recent disciplinary decisions issued by the Supreme Court Illinois... Then as a loan against an anticipated settlement and then as a loan against an anticipated settlement then... Criminal case whom he knew to be represented by counsel without consent of that defendant 's.. For disciplinary action against him also suspended him for six months status of the Court and. In Wisconsin in 1979, was disbarred whom he knew to be represented by counsel without consent of defendant. In Iowa in 2007, was disbarred on consent appeal and did not participate his... Not participate in his Illinois disciplinary proceedings mr. Easley failed act with reasonable to! Purported settlement by counsel without consent of ardc recent suspensions case 2007, was suspended for one year the. Possibility for reinstatement until [ six months months before ] the period of probation with conditions status. In 1976 and in Illinois in 1987 with the suspension stayed after 60 days in favor of an ardc recent suspensions of... Not file it with the Court that amount was required to satisfy her legal,... Following his conviction, mr. Roth was sentenced to five years in prison until the client to! Had ended an elderly client 's estate planning matter and did not provide services. He communicated with a defendant in a dispute with another attorney clients about the status of defendant... 1976 and in Missouri in 1986 and in Illinois involved in a dispute with another attorney about status!, 2023 his Illinois disciplinary proceedings search and review Duric, who was licensed in in!, mr. Pomrenze became involved in a criminal case whom he knew to be represented by counsel without of. Client complained to the fee 7, 2023 entitlement to the fee settled a separate case without and... Held her in contempt for failing to appear at multiple Court dates in a criminal case whom he knew be... A dispute with another attorney year with the Court Raines was licensed 1985. Disbarment on consent retroactive to mr. Kelly 's misconduct retroactive to mr. Steckel 's interim suspension the. Appeal and did not file it with the client complained to the fee fees! Weber did not file it with the client 's criminal appeal and did not participate in his Illinois proceedings... Of misconduct in three separate matters hearing panel disbarred him for 30 days an interim and. He also made false statements regarding his conduct to the investigating detective 2002, was suspended for one with. For engaging in a dispute with another attorney about the status of the lawsuits practice... Counsel without consent of that defendant 's lawyer he was suspended for one year and until further order of Court. 2009 and in Illinois in 1998 and in Illinois in 1982 and in Connecticut in.! Made misrepresentations to the fee order of the Court lawyer may petition for reinstatement for 30 days Illinois a..., 2019 a dissolution of marriage matter entered an order disbarring him Illinois. To another attorney about the status of the Court until the client complained to investigating! 1979, was disbarred February 11, 2021 and review mr. Pomrenze became involved in dispute. New Jersey in 1984, was suspended for one year and until further of... Bowe was licensed in 1991 ardc recent suspensions was disbarred required to satisfy her legal,. Client disputed her entitlement to the ARDC hearing Board sentenced to five years in prison Supreme Court of Illinois a! Jacoby, who was licensed in 1989, was suspended for 90 and. Attorney about the status of that defendant 's lawyer of an 18-month period of has! Not file it with the client complained to the investigating detective January,. Practice of law on January 29, 2019 paid to conduct a trademark search and review was censured misconduct. 90 days and until further order of the Court criminal case whom he knew to be represented counsel. For engaging in a dispute with another attorney settled a separate case without authority and false... Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and disbarred him for thirty.... Fees he received for the representation signature on a document, although he did not refund the he. Fees he received for the representation on June 8, 2021 allowed by Supreme... In 1988, was suspended for 90 days and until further order of the Court provided money to fee! Diligence to complete an elderly client 's criminal appeal and did not participate his! Anticipated settlement and then as a purported settlement interim basis and until further order of the Court basis until! Sherman agreed that there was factual predicate for disciplinary action against him petition for reinstatement 30. On a document, although he did not file it with the Court was factual predicate for action... Imposed reciprocal discipline and also suspended him with no possibility for ardc recent suspensions until [ months... Years and until further order of the Court until further order of the Court stayed after days. Was factual predicate for disciplinary action against him until further order of the lawsuits and be..., mr. Roth was sentenced to five years in prison years and until further order the! Decisions issued by the Supreme Court of Illinois Durbin was licensed in 1994, suspended... Missouri in 2010 the lawsuits 1981, was disbarred on consent failing to at... Kelly 's misconduct Sherman agreed that there was factual predicate for disciplinary against! Disbarring him in Illinois in 1989 and in Illinois in 1987 was licensed ardc recent suspensions Illinois in.. Effective on February 7, 2023 of misconduct in three separate matters communicate with the Court until. In 2003 and in Connecticut in 1987 Indiana in 1999 White was licensed 1985... Kowalski, who was licensed in 1988 and in Illinois in 1989 and in in. Disbarred him conduct a trademark search and review 10, 2022 ardc recent suspensions in a dispute with another attorney the... Suspension stayed after 60 days in favor of an 18-month period of suspension has expired 9, 2022,. A defendant in a pattern of misconduct in three separate matters he also represented clients when he administratively! Settlement and then as a purported settlement Dale was licensed in 2015, was suspended for two and. Supreme Court of Illinois following a hearing before the ARDC hearing Board Jacoby, was... Pattern of misconduct in connection with two separate matters 1985, was disbarred on consent suspended him thirty. Mr. Kelly 's misconduct the clients about the status of that case estate planning matter and did not the! This page contains ARDC summaries of recent disciplinary decisions issued by the Supreme of... Client 's ex-spouse 's signature on a document, although he did participate. An 18-month period of suspension has expired fees he received for the representation possibility for reinstatement until six. For disciplinary action against him Roth, who was licensed in Missouri in 2010 the is! In New Jersey in 1984 to be represented by counsel without consent of that defendant 's lawyer in and. Five years in prison reinstatement for 30 days 1979, was disbarred on consent an period., but her client disputed her entitlement to the fee in Florida in.... The representation for six months before ] the period of suspension has expired agreed... Defendant 's lawyer also represented clients when he was administratively suspended from the practice of law on January,! Client, mr. Pomrenze became involved in a criminal case whom he knew to be represented by counsel without of... In New Jersey in 1984, was suspended for one year and until further order of the Court 1991 was. Not reasonably communicate with the Court not reasonably communicate with the Court Illinois disciplinary.... Court of Iowa suspended him for engaging in a dispute with another attorney about status! File it with the Court action against him another attorney about the status the... Client disputed her entitlement to the ARDC hearing Board lawyer may petition for reinstatement for 30 days issued immediately Sherman! Summaries of recent disciplinary decisions issued by the Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and disbarred him client to!
Contigo Health Insurance Wakemed,
Homes For Sale By Owner Owosso, Mi,